Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM Preference-Vote (Was Wish List -Summary & Petition)

Subject: Re: [OM] OM Preference-Vote (Was Wish List -Summary & Petition)
From: sschaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 16:19:55 -0800 (PST)
> 1. Which one of the new OM bodies (OM reissues with possibly a few new
> features, one under $500, one ca. $700, and an OM-5 under $1500) would you
> buy in the next 2-5 years? Just one or two or all three? (You have to ask
> your own pocketbook and your buying habit.)

$500.  But only if I was convinced that Olympus was going to be in the 35mm 
business for a while.

> 2.Would you like to have an autofocusing OM-x? (Be honest.  You don't need
> to be realistic here.)

Focus assist, yes.  Not autofocus.

> 3. Would you be willing to have a somewhat larger OM body so that several
> new features may be accommodated?

I would prefer not.  (I would also prefer not to go bald; preferences 
don't count for much, do they?)

> 4. What is the single most important feature of the OM body that you would
> like to see retained? Please narrow your preferences down to the single
> feature.  I will not count those votes with two items here.

Compatibility with existing lenses.  

Unless that counts as part of the definition of "OM", in which case
size.

Steve Schaffner
sschaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

##################################################################
# This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
# To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
#   with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
#
# To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
# listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
#
# For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz