At 1/19/98 01:59 PM -0800, you wrote:
>1. Which one of the new OM bodies (OM reissues with possibly a few new
>features, a. one under $500, b. one ca. $700, and c. an OM-5 under $1500)
>would you
>buy in the next 2-5 years? Just one or two or all three? (You have to ask
>your own pocketbook and your buying habit.)
a. None unless it was as good as an OM-1
b. As long as it had spot metering, 1
c. OM-5? 1
TOTAL - 2
>2.Would you like to have an autofocusing OM-x? (Be honest. You don't need
>to be realistic here.)
It'd be nice, but I'm not willing to rebuy the $5,000+ in lenses I have.
I'd rather have quality.
>3. Would you be willing to have a somewhat larger OM body so that several
>new features may be accommodated?>
They'd better be good features, and the bodies should be backward
compatable with most/all the key OM-system componants. But not too much
bigger.
>4. What is the single most important feature of the OM body that you would
>like to see retained? Please narrow your preferences down to the single
>feature. I will not count those votes with two items here.
>
Spot-metering, including highlight/shadow, and multi-reading integration
Skip
-----------------------------------------------
Skip Williams - skipwilliams@xxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------
##################################################################
# This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
# To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
#
# To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
# listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
#
# For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################
|