Dagfinn wrote:
>
>"I am seriously considering a Zuiko wide angle, 24mm or 28mm.
>
>Does anybody have any experience with the 24/2.8 or 28/2.8? I am thinking
>now in terms of sharpness and flare resistance. Compared to the f2.0
>versions of the same lenses, how good are the cheaper f2.8 ones?
>
>This is heresy, of course: Do you recommend any good off-brand lenses?
>
>And another question: Should I buy a 24mm or a 28mm? I usually use my 50mm,
>shooting people, architecture and some landscape. I'd like to hear other
people's preferences. Why should I decide for one and not the other?"
Dagfin
My two-bob's worth! I don't have many lenses, and know little about the
tech details. I do however own a Zuiko MC 24mm 2.8. I use this lens for
landscapes (Aus bush stuff) and I think it's fabulous. I prefer it to a
35mm for this purpose, and have had lots of good results with it. I
recently had 4 shots published in a wildlife magazine (landscape shots)
taken with this lens, they turned out well! Send me your address and
I'll mail you a copy of the mag if I can get organised!
Cheers
Robert Ashdown
>Australia
>
>
>
##################################################################
# This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
# To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
#
# To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
# listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
#
# For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################
|