Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 180mm/f2.8 Zuiko

Subject: Re: [OM] 180mm/f2.8 Zuiko
From: Tomoko Yamamoto <tomokoy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 1998 07:59:23 -0800
At 09:46 PM 2/6/98 -0800, Larry Clark wrote:
>Rob Roy wrote:
>> 
>> Last week a friend showed me his newly acquired 180mm/f2.8 Zuiko 
>> which he had purchased...
>> 
>> Last night he showed me some astrophotos he had taken before he 
>> took the lens back to the store.  I have never seen anything 
>> like them.  The stars were football-shaped (astigmatism) and the
>> brighter ones had blue halos around them (chromatic aberration).  
>> Any ideas as to what is going on?  I have never even heard of 
>> such a bad lens!?
>
>Is it the 180 f/2 or the 180 f/2.8 that is well known for chromatic
>aberrations -- and therefore not a sweet deal for astrophotography?
>
I have found the following from my mailbox.
(I have recently considered buying a 180/2.8, so this lens thread piqued my
interest)

>I'm not certain, but I believe the NASA 180mm was the f/2.  At the time
>that it was tested (apparently they test all equipment that they are
>considering for use in space) it was said that that particular lens (the
>180mmf/2) was the sharpest 35mm format lens that they had ever tested.  I
>have an old Modern Photography around somewhere circa 1985 that listed
>lenses NASA was going to be using and from memory I know the 180mmf/2 and
>28mmf/2 were included and I think the 50mmf1.4 but anything else has been
>forgotten.  I can try to dig up the issue this was in and confirm.
>I have owned both lenses (180mmf/2 and 180mmf/2.8).  The f/2 was truly
>phenomenal and the f/2.8 was very sharp and contrasty but had this strange
>purple fringing/flare around backlit or highlight areas (probably pretty
>noticeable on stars against a black background---maybe the cause of the
>"dog" reputation with astrophotographers).  It was very subtle but it was
>there and kinda annoying.  I checked this on a friend's Zuiko 180mmf/2.8
>and it was there also.  Other than that it was a fine lens.
>In comparison to the Nikkor 180mmf/2.8 (I shot with the manual focus AIS
>version for 6 years) I found the two lenses very comprable---except for
>that purple fringing on the Zuiko.  The Zuiko 180mmf/2 blew both the
>f/2.8's away.  Of course, so did the price.
>
>Jeff Horner


Tomoko Yamamoto
Photographer, Composer, Soprano
mailto:tomokoy@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.charm.net/~tomokoy/
-All the photos (except panorama) with OM's-
http://ep.com/ep/csp.html?csp=1130
-Olympus Equipment Classifieds-

##################################################################
# This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
# To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
#   with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
#
# To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
# listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
#
# For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz