David,
Thank you for posting the OM article - a well enjoyed read. It did get me
thinking though. The author commented -- "My own feeling is that
whatever the desirability of the fast Zuiko lenses, the standard apertures
are more likely to have high performance." -- Is that so? I'm considering
adding a 21mm to my lens range (24mm is the widest so far), and have a
choice between the f/2.0 and f/3.5. The cost difference is nearly double.
While that certainly gets my attention, I'd expect comparable sharpness and
image quality between the two. Is the f/3.5 a superior performer? If so,
I'll save my $$$ for more film <g>.
John P
############################################################
| This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
| To receive the Digest version send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| with "subscribe olympus-digest" in the message body.
| To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
| listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe olympus" in the body.
| For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| htttp://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html
############################################################
|