Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] 40mm Zuiko again

Subject: RE: [OM] 40mm Zuiko again
From: "R. Wastell" <rrw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 19:55:59 -0900
I picked up one of these earlier this year for a very decent price ( I couldn't 
justify the high prices I see advertised). The lens is very small (short) and 
the filter threads are on the aperture ring. This makes the aperture difficult 
to set without a filter mounted. 

I have not used it much yet but the few exposures I have made were not 
noticeably better or worse than my 50 1.8. ( for Gary: early model, silver 
front ring, single coated, 5 digit serial number ;)

I would suggest you try the lens on a body to see if you like the way it 
handles before you decide. When the sun comes back I think I will try it as a 
point and shoot with the aperture and  focus set for a convenient hyperfocal 
distance and some Kodak MAX .

Bob


----------
From:   Richard Schätzl[SMTP:Richard.Schaetzl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:   Tuesday, February 10, 1998 10:01 AM
To:     olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:        [OM] 40mm Zuiko again

Hello Olympians,

in my town is a 40m 2,0 Zuiko for sale. I consider to buy it, are there
any experience with the 40mm OM-Zuiko? 
Did you test your 40mm, Michael?

Richard

Garth Wood wrote:
> 
> At 12:08 PM 12/18/97 GMT, Frank van Lindert <lindertv@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >On 17 Dec 1997 23:29:38 GMT, mc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael A.
> >Covington) wrote:
> >
> >>I understand the Olympus 40-mm f/2 lens is somewhat rare and in
> >>demand... I have one that I'm wondering if I should sell. It's in
> >>excellent condition and includes the original box that it came in.
> >>What would a lens like this be worth?
> >
> >
> >I guess between $200 excellent and $250 mint would be fair, Michael.
> >
> >Frank.
> 
> I must have missed this particular missive to the list -- all my
> contributions from Michael C. on that date don't mention his wish to sell a
> 40mm Oly at all.  If that's the case, I asked about such a lens a while ago
> in one of the Usenet groups (I was interested in buying).  Here's the
> feedback I got in private mail from one of the newsgroup hounds:
> 
> (After quoting my original message about it being a relatively rare lens,
> Joseph Albert [jalbert@xxxxxxx] wrote):
> 
> "It is also highly collectible, and will sell in the $275-395 range.
> thjat is for mint-.  of course, every ding will take $40 off its value,
> so it is an expensive lens to use.  and it isn't quite as sharp
> or  quite as well corrected as the 50/1.8.  
snip..



############################################################
| This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
| To receive the Digest version send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|    with "subscribe olympus-digest" in the message body.
| To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
|   listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe olympus" in the body.
| For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|    htttp://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html
############################################################


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz