On Mer, 11 feb 1998 17:31, cosmos@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:cosmos@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>1) How would I know if it is a Sigma APO lens, because it is nowhere
>written as such?
If it is APO, they write in block letters. If there is not this signature,
it is not APO.
>
>2) I may be mistaken but I thought it was the Sigma 300mm f4.0 or the
>400mm f5.6 which were APO, not the 300mm f5.6. Comments, anyone?
Oh, you are right, my lens is the 300 f4. :-))) That is why it is so easy
to focus! :-)))
>3) The Sigma-Z 300mm f5.6 I saw has an Olympus OM bayonet. Should I
>pass this one up and save for the Zuiko 300mm f4.5? Since the Zuiko
>would be three times more expensive, is it three times better?
I believe it is, but not from direct aquaintance.
>
>4) Am I to understand that Nikon is selling rebadged Sigma lenses?
No, I meant Nikon (D) *mount*.
Marco
mailto:tom@xxxxxxxxxxxx
############################################################
| This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
| To receive the Digest version send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| with "subscribe olympus-digest" in the message body.
| To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
| listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe olympus" in the body.
| For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| htttp://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html
############################################################
|