Ulf Westerberg wrote:
>
> Gary Schloss wrote earlier:
> >
> >Unless your lens also has "MC" inscribed on its rim (unlikely!),
> >it's single-coated. IMHO, this should be of little concern or
> >deterrent to you, especially re: this particular lens which, in my
> >experience, is phenomenally good.
>
> Gary Schloss also wrote:
> >To the MC issue: Per, you may be disappoined -- your lens is not MC.
> >My own 300/f4.5 is serial #1113xx, and it's still SC.
> >
I have a quite new Zuiko 300/4.5 which is marked solely Zuiko, although
it is multicoated. Very early nonmulticoted 300/4.5:s were called F
Zuiko, then
came the multicoated version marked MC without the "F", to separate it
from the
nonmulticoated version. In the late 80s (?) MC was left out from all
lenses. Some
lenses that have been multicoated from the beginning of production,
for example the 28/2.0, were marked MC already in the early 70s.
Mikael v. N.
############################################################
| This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
| To receive the Digest version mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| with "subscribe olympus-digest" in the message body.
| To unsubscribe from the current list mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| with "unsubscribe olympus" in the body.
| For questions mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html
############################################################
|