Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Sigma 14/3.5?

Subject: Re: [OM] Sigma 14/3.5?
From: Richard Schätzl <Richard.Schaetzl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 12:37:05 +0100
Richard Schätzl wrote:

snip...
> But I found an test of the 14mm Sigma in an german magazin (foMag 1/91):

I forget, there was a ranking of another magazin (based on a Test in
CoFo 4/96):

Lens                            Points  Rating

Leica Super-Elmar-R 3,5 15mm    67,1    Good
Nikon Nikkor 3,5 15mm           64,4    Good
Pentax-A 3,5 15mm               60,1    Acceptable
Nikon Nikkor 5,6 13mm           58,8    Acceptable
Canon EF 2,8 14mm L USM         57,0    Acceptable
Sigma 3,5 14mm                  54,8    Acceptable

Max. points = 100

This rating migth be biased (towards Nikon, Leica), in the  same table
is a rating of macro lenses which gaves the Micro Nikkor a better rating
than the 90mm Macro Zuiko, there own test (CoFo 1/88) showed that the
Zuiko is much better than the Nikkor on par with the Zeiss. The Nikkor
was worse the the Tokina AT-X or Pentax-F macro lens, definitly the
weekest lens.
So much to lens tests...

Richard



############################################################
| This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
| To receive the Digest version mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|    with "subscribe olympus-digest" in the message body.
| To unsubscribe from the current list mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|    with "unsubscribe olympus" in the body.
| For questions mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html
############################################################


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz