Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Monocular was Binocular adapter

Subject: Re: [OM] Monocular was Binocular adapter
From: Frank van Lindert <lindertv@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 14:44:27 GMT
On Sat, 14 Mar 1998 08:39:58 +0100, "Per Nordenberg"
<per.nordenberg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


>Thanks Frank (I hope you can read this without too much trouble). If my memory 
>serves me well (I can be wrong though) I believe Hama of Germany had 2 
>monocular adapters in their cataloque with different quality and price. 
>Perhaps you have a similar lower priced adapter?
>
>Per Nordenberg

Cheap it was indeed, Per...

I can't tell anything else about it.
I bought a cheap pair of real binoculars (Olympus, which in the
binocular line is low-end for price and quality) and although I
realize it isn't to be compared with a first class set, it serves me
well.

The only reason to buy Olympus in this case was that it was one of the
few binoculars which let me look through without my glasses on (-6
diopters strength) from near to infinite ditance. A beautiful and very
expensive Swarovski didn't offer enough correction for my vision.....

Frank.

############################################################
| This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
| To receive the Digest version mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|    with "subscribe olympus-digest" in the message body.
| To unsubscribe from the current list mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|    with "unsubscribe olympus" in the body.
| For questions mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html
############################################################


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz