I guess that would be the logical belief. I hope it's not true, though. We
need a full-featured 5 and 6Ti (like Hans described) much more than an
auto-2000.
george
John Hermanson wrote:
> Yes, it will probably be an "auto" version of the 2000.
>
> John
> www.zuiko.com
>
> Per Nordenberg wrote:
>
> > -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> > Från: Gary Schloss <schloss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Till: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Datum: den 3 maj 1998 23:03
> > Ämne: Re: [OM] OM-2000
> >
> > >Not to rain on anyone's parade, but IMHO, in light of the successful
> > >launch of OM-2000, we should be prepared for introduction of a new body
> > >that may resemble a Nikon FE-10 sprinkled with some OM-2000 features,
> > >i.e. a plastic-bodied version of an OM-2S.
> >
> > Sounds real interesting Gary. Do you think it would be too much to ask for
> > if they could retain that "sexy" shutter sound of the OM-2S? If so I think
> > I would consider it.
> >
> > Per Nordenberg
> >
> > P.S. It wasn´t me who discribed it that way in the first place, but then I
> > came to think of it...
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|