Richard Schätzl wrote:
>
> gma wrote:
>
> > the Zuiko zooms are every bit as good as the primes
> > (if not better!) I base this mainly on a comparison of the resolution
> > test numbers. For example, the 35-105 at 105 appears to be
> > substantially better than the 100 F/2.8 and even the 100 F/2.0 !! And
> > the 35-70 F/3.6 at 35 betters the 35 F/2.0.
>
> > Do you (or anyone else) have any thoughts on this? Or is
> > my interpretation of the data faulty?
>
> Unfortunaly, you are right. To cure your depression I´m willing to trade in
> your pimes and compensate you with zooms ;-)
>
> Richard
>
--
Hey! Thanks for the offer! How about a 35 F/2 and a 50 F/1.2 for a 35-70
f/4??
Do you have experience with the zooms which says they're as good as or
almost as good as the primes? Or were you just kidding? (As I was
above.)
george :>)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|