Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FW: FW: FW: [OM] Now I remember why... (somewhat wedding equipment

Subject: Re: FW: FW: FW: [OM] Now I remember why... (somewhat wedding equipment off topic -
From: *- DORIS FANG -* <sfsttj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 16:15:29 -0400 (EDT)

On Fri, 22 May 1998, KRIS GARREN wrote:

> I get so frustrated when I get a roll back and there are
> some that are out of focus or any other of the millions of
> problems that occur.  I want that perfect roll where they all
> turn out great - how often does that actually occur?

  Technically, it happens, but that is the least of one's problems.

  Do
> professionals get it right every time?  If not, what percentage
> of the time is reasonable to expect prints that are wrong (i.e.
> 3 pictures out of a roll of 24)?

 No, they don't get it right every time, and it depends a lot on
conditions and subject. As Ansel Adams said, if you get one worthwhile
photo a month during a given year, it was a good crop. Of course, he was
referring to world-class fine art imagery. 
                                           *= Doris Fang =*




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz