>Frank van Lindert <lindertv@xxxxxxx> wisely pointed out:
><.....snip.....>
>>I would certainly go for the 3.6 (.......) provided the very special shade
>is
>>included.
>
>I'll second that. Frank's reminder regarding the shade is very important
>with this lens. One doesn't like to point out their mistakes, but I have,
>on a very few occasions, not used the shade and the results were noticeably
>poor. It is prone to flare without it. It makes more of a difference than
>you might think.
>
>John P
>
I am always surprised at a caution like this. Do people actually try to use
any lens without a shade?
Winsor
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California
mailto:wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|