>I still haven't made a comparison between the 135 mm f/3.5 Zuiko and the
135
>mm f/4.5 Macro Zuiko, but I intend to do so when I find a good flat planed
>subject and some time and film on my hands.
I'm very interested to see the results from this. At infinity too.
>I did compare four approaches to 50 mm focal length photography. I shot a
>USGS topographic map from about 4 feet (1:20 magnification) on Agfachrome
>RSX50 slide film with blue photofloods exposed at E.I. 100. I corrected
the
>focus with a Varimagnifinder. I used (all at f/5.6) a:
>50 mm f/2.0 Macro Zuiko
>50 mm f/1.8 Zuiko (single coated)
>50 mm f/1.4 Zuiko (single coated)
>35-70 mm f/3.5~4.5 Zoom Zuiko at 50 mm
I wonder what the 50mm f3.5 would come out like. Better or worse than the
f2.0?
Foxy
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|