On Sat, 20 Jun 1998, Denton Taylor wrote:
> >>This might be a good excuse to issue something commemorative.>>
>
> It should definitely be a prestige lens, but relatively affordable
> I vote for a 200 macro--here's why.
I vote for something in the 80-200/2.8 (maybe a tiny 80-200/4?) or
70-300/4.5 range, of similar quality to the 35-80. OM is in direst need of
a complementary lens to that magnificent 35-80.
*= Doris Fang =*
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|