Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Ideal OM-1 Reissue? (was OM-5)

Subject: Re: [OM] Ideal OM-1 Reissue? (was OM-5)
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 1998 13:26:40 -0500 (CDT)
>> I was interested in your comments about LED meters. I love the analogue
>> meter in my OM-1n, as I can see changes easily. (i.e. with the 2000 is
>1/4
>> stop correct exposure or 1/2 out?). Low light is a problem though. I
>haven't
>> thought of an advantage of the LEDs until now.
>>
>> Foxy
>>
>
>Yes, there is, the LEDs are much cheaper than the galvanometer design.
>
>C.H.Ling
>
LEDs are well nigh indestructible. I bumped a Canon F1 with the
galvanometer design on a restroom door without the meter in the locked
position and it resulted in in a fairly expensive repair.

Winsor

Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California
mailto:wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx





< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz