On Sat, 20 Jun 1998, *- DORIS FANG -* wrote:
|
|
|On Sat, 20 Jun 1998, Denton Taylor wrote:
|
|> >>This might be a good excuse to issue something commemorative.>>
|>
|> It should definitely be a prestige lens, but relatively affordable
|> I vote for a 200 macro--here's why.
|
| I vote for something in the 80-200/2.8 (maybe a tiny 80-200/4?) or
|70-300/4.5 range, of similar quality to the 35-80. OM is in direst need of
|a complementary lens to that magnificent 35-80.
Lady Zuiko has spoken! All who have ears, let them hear!
A "tiny" 80-200/4 would be an upgrade of the 65-200/4. An
80-200/2.8 or 70-210/2.8 would be a welcome sight. A
70-300/4.5 zoom would update the 85-250/5 and 50-250/5
optical turtles.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|