Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re:[OM] Re: Film Reflectance Variance

Subject: Re:[OM] Re: Film Reflectance Variance
From: "Bruce Appelbaum" <Bruce_Appelbaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 9:19 -0500
About 13 years ago, I bought an OM2SP for use in an overseas project.  The
primary use of the camera was to make presentation slides using the Polaroid
Polachrome "instant" 35mm slide system.

The film was very shiny, and the instructions came with the warning that the use
of OTF metering could result in incorrect exposures.  The camera could be used
in manual mode, but OTF readings would be incorrect.


____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject:    [OM] Re: Film Reflectance Variance
Author: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (lclark)
Date:       6/23/1998 1:40 PM

In <bd9b449f.358b00da@xxxxxxx>, on 06/19/98 at 08:22 PM,
   PCACala@xxxxxxx said:


>You report Kodak Gold 100 as being "off" in OTF exposures . . .  I get
>a 0.7 stop overexposure when using it in OTF mode.  That and Sensia II
>200 are equally the worst for overexposure (i.e., they reflect less
>than the assumed 18%).  I haven't tried the other 2 emulsions.  I
>suspect your were referring to the old Fujichrome RD 100, rather than
>Provia or Astia?

I can sense a request welling up for a listing of the exposure compen-
sation dial settings for most of the currently available films.
Obviously a collaborative effort of list members.


les clark
-----------------------------------------------------------
lclark@xxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------------------


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz