What I meant to say was: that hand picked 4 I bought was # 991,956 just below 1
million.
John
Mike Bloor wrote:
> I have looked at the serial numbers of all the Olympus equipment I own. The
> serial numbers seem to follow no pattern at all. The first lens I ever
> bought (an early 50mm 1.8) has the second highest serial number of all my
> equipment, including lenses which did not even exist when I bought the 50mm.
>
> If someone out there thinks that they can bring some sense to the numbers we
> could all send lists of our equipment (item, age if known, serial number,
> MC/SC if known) and it might provide a resourse which would help us guage
> the age and specification of other equipment offered for sale.
>
> Mike Bloor.
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|