Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Was Digital vs Film, is now Fawlty Towers and OM addiction.

Subject: Re: [OM] Was Digital vs Film, is now Fawlty Towers and OM addiction.
From: gma <gma@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 13:14:15 -0700
Pauls0627@xxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 9/9/98 3:03:54 PM Eastern Daylight Time, gma@xxxxxxxxxx
> writes:
> 
> << The 'small' bag feels too crowded.  No wonder, it holds: OM-4 w/Winder2,
>  65-200/4, 50/1.4, 28-48/4, 85/2, T-32, small flash grip.  Then I realize
>  I need something wider, namely my 24/2.8. Also, notice no macro
>  capability and that breaks the bank.  So, here's what I'm thinking now:>>
> 
> Forgot to mention, I keep a set of extension tubes (7, 14, and 25) in the "big
> bag", and a simple closeup lens (+4) in the small bag
> 
>  <>
> 
> One of these days I'll get myself some sort of point-and-shoot. When I suggest
> it, all I hear is "Not another camera!!!"
> 
>  <<Large Tamrac bag: Everything above from the old small bag.  Plus the
>  24/2.8, OM-1, 80/4, 65-116 tube, T-8 ring flash.
> 
>  Photo backpack: OM-4T w/MD-2, OM-2n w/MD-1, OM-2SP (with IR back),
>  16/3.5, 21/2, 28/2, 35/2, 50/2, 90/2, 135/2.8, 100-200/5, 300/4.5, 1.4x,
>  2x, 7, 14, 25 tubes, F280, T32, Bounce Grip 2.
> 
>  Jeez, now all I need is some time to use this stuff. >>
> 
> Man, I thought I had a problem figuring out what to do with it. What problems
> we have....
> 
> Paul Schings
> Coventry, RI


Yeah, as others have said "We live in a great time."
-- 


george  :>)

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz