Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Reciprocity failure and Olympus auto exposure

Subject: Re: [OM] Reciprocity failure and Olympus auto exposure
From: "Shawn Wright" <swright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 17:57:11 -0800
On  8 Sep 98 at 0:55, John Austin wrote:

> At the risk of getting flamed, I would add that the N*k*n F90x (N90s) and F5
> are both marvelous machines in the hands of someone that is experienced with
> their use. Of course, it requires that you have a photographic memory to
> memorize the lenghty manual, and in the case of the F5, a sherpa or two to
> carry your gear wouldn't hurt. I wouldn't mind having an F5, as a supplement
> to my OMs of course. And then again there is that little matter of giving up
> food for a year so I could pay for it. Leaving now so I can find my kevlar
> underwear. :-)
> 
I don't doubt this, but my point was that very few modem technobricks seems to 
meter much below 1EV, whereas my 4T says it will go to -5EV, which is quite a 
difference. Or as you alluded to, even if they do, most technobrick slaves have 
no idea how to make the camera do what *they* want...
Since I work with computers all day long, I have *zero* interest in learning 
yet another computer platform in my photography - it is an escape for me.

Just my $.02

========================
Shawn Wright
Computer Systems Manager
Shawnigan Lake School
250-743-6240
swright@xxxxxxxxx

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz