Joseph Albert first wrote:
>> one point not mentioned in comparing the 35/2 and 35/2.8 is that
>> the 35/2.8 is more flare resistant. It is one of the most flare
resistant
>>lenses I've used actually. even the single-coated 35/2.8's can be
>> pointed at the sun and create images without ghosting of the aperture
>> blades.
>>snip>
The Shawn Wright wrote:
>Generally, this may be true, but my SC 35/2.8 definitely will
>produce flare, sometimes a lot, with the sun in the frame, or near
>the edge.
>snip>
Agreed upon, Shawn. I sold my SC35/2.8 just because of this as it was quite
flare-prone. No way that lens could be pointed with the sun in the fram at
sunsets etc. without much ghosting. My present MC 35/2 produces some flare,
but is far better in this aspect.
Ulf Westerberg
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|