OUCH, Hurt me! Boy would it ever.
george
Denton Taylor wrote:
> >>Olympus should do a 300/4 APO, an updated 180/2.8, an updated 200/4,
> a 70-210/2.8 or 80-200/2.8, a 400/5.6 APO at the minimum. They could
> probably contract with Sigma to supply the opics for a 70-210/2.8
> 300/4, and 400/5.6. those three along along with the fast glass
> series of teles would fix Olympus' tele offerings. If they wanted
> to compete for bird photographers money, a 600/4 added
> to the fast glass series would be helpful. >>
>
> We could also use a 200 macro, and a couple other fancy zooms, like Canon
> L, say 17-35. Wouldn't a 17-35 2.8, 35-80 2.8, and a 80-200 2.8 be nice?
>
> Regards,
>
> Denton Taylor
> _______________________________
> Photogallery at www.dentontaylor.com
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|