Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] apo lenses

Subject: Re: [OM] apo lenses
From: "R. Lee Hawkins" <lhawkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 11:21:44 -0400
Cc: lhawkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In your message dated: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 03:23:44 MDT you write:
>
>Winsor writes:
>
>So if I understand you correctly, a well designed 300/f4.5 with a little
>low dispersion glass will correct for chromatic aberration as well a faster
>APO design with ultra low dispersion glass. The design of the lens, like
>other design, is using materials appropriate to the task.
>===============================
>
>Not quite what I said.  at f/5.6 a 300mm lens doesn't need an apochromatic
>design.  I didn't say exactly where it becomes critical, but given that
>Olympus includes some low dispersion elements in the later 300/4.5 designs
>(it wasn't in the early ones) they obviously think it needs it, so I'll
>assume it does.  For sure, a 300/4 does.

I'd be interested to know the reference for the above claim.  As stated
in the FAQ (and verified by Oly America), Olympus never redesigned a
lens to use different elements.  Coatings changed, but not elements.

Cheers,
--Lee

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz