Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] mc or not?

Subject: Re: [OM] mc or not?
From: Frank van Lindert <lindertv@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 15:59:24 GMT
On Fri, 02 Oct 1998 07:45:32 GMT, Frank van Lindert <lindertv@xxxxxxx>
wrote:

>On Thu, 1 Oct 1998 23:00:52 +0200, Wijsmuller.VanderBel@xxxxxx wrote:
>
>>About this MC thing:
>>
>>When I made a list of my Zuiko's so far (for insurance purposes), 
>>there seems to be these six categories (which are probably not 
>>complete or faulty because of my lack of Zuiko's ;-( ).
>>
>>aperture and focus distance like '1:3.5 f=135mm'
>>      silver rings
>>1             element character (like E.Zuiko)
>>2             no element character
>>      no silver rings
>>3             element character
>>4             no element character
>>5             no element character, 'mc' mentioned
>>aperture and focus distance like '35mm 1:2'
>>      no silver rings
>>              no element character
>>6                     no 'mc' mentioned
>>
>>It would be interesting to 'couple' these categories to multicoating 
>>(or not). I think the categories 5 and 6 are *always* mc, and maybe 
>>categorie 1 is *never* mc. But I do not really know. Maybe it is 
>>possible for Gary S. or Frank van L. to give the definitive answer?
>
>Hi Frank.
>
>AFAIK all silver rim lenses (your cat 1 and 2) are not multi-coated.
>Frank van Lindert.

OOPS!... I remembered something and checked - I do own a silver rimmed
MC 28/2.0 so my earlier message was definitely wrong. Apologies!

Frank.

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz