Hi All,
Ziv sez the OM-1(N) has only? a 93 0.000000ield of view, but with .92X mag with
a 50mm lens vs. .84X for the OM-2000. OM-10 had same spex as OM-1(N)'s
did (according to Ziv)
my .02 cents worth...
Bill
>; )
On Wed, 21 Oct 1998 23:26:48 -0400 (EDT) Dave Haynie <dhaynie@xxxxxxxxxx>
writes:
>On Wed, 21 Oct 1998 18:17:18 -0500, brookswf@xxxxxxxx (BILL F BROOKS)
>jammed all night, and by sunrise was overheard remarking:
>
>> OM-2000 has a just adequate viewfinder @ 930f picture field w/50mm
>lens
>> (Oly's data)
>
>> >As I recall, my old OM-10 did not have a 97creen. I think only
>> >the OM 1-2-3-4 have it.
>
>Yup -- as I recall, the 1-2-3-4 have the 97creen, while the
>consumer
>market cameras and the OM-2000 indeed deliver a 93% view. I haven't
>found any reference on the relative brightness (which also varies
>somewhat by the focusing screen used in the pro-line systems, and of
>course, your lens). I had both OM-1 and OM-4, separated by about two
>years, though (the OM-1 was stolen, I saved and bought an OM-4 when in
>Tokyo in '85), so I never had the chance to A/B them. The OM-4's
>beamsplitter will steal a little light, but perhaps not enough to make
>a
>visible difference.
>
>--
>Dave Haynie | V.P. Technology, Met@box Infonet, AG |
>http://www.metabox.de
>Be Dev #2024 | NB851 Powered! | Amiga 2000, 3000, 4000, PIOS One
>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|