Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re[2]: Re[2]: Re[2]: [OM] OM-4T(and others... (eyepoint)

Subject: Re[2]: Re[2]: Re[2]: [OM] OM-4T(and others... (eyepoint)
From: Dave Haynie <dhaynie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 01:36:00 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 25 Oct 1998 15:52:21 -0600, brookswf@xxxxxxxx (BILL F BROOKS) jammed 
all night, and by sunrise was overheard remarking:

> I got my data from a copy of Ziv's viewfinder page that I made 8-9 months
> ago...I only have the net @ work so I copy the .htm's and the pix that go
> w/'em and then view the site @ my leisure at home.  I haven't been @ his
> site lately and if it's been updated, then shame on me for passing
> bad/old data, but what I wrote earlier _is_ what his site did say at one
> time...sorry 

Well, I checked it -- you're certainly passing on Ziv's info, he's
simply incorrect. In fact, he's not self-consistent; his viewfinder pages
claim 93 0.000000or the OM-1, his camera guide claims 97%.  

I'll point this out...

--
Dave Haynie  | V.P. Technology, Met@box Infonet, AG |  http://www.metabox.de
Be Dev #2024 | NB851 Powered! | Amiga 2000, 3000, 4000, PIOS One



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz