I too am shocked by Jans hot tempered idea. Maybe he wrote it before cooling
down.
The person buying the equipment certainly has no part in it.
John
*- DORIS FANG -* wrote:
> I must admit that the attitude expressed by Mr. Steinman appalled me.
> First, if you really believe a person would act that way towards you, why
> would you want to touch/own anything they owned ? I want the best of vibes
> in my photo equipment. Nothing less will do.
> Second, the part about suing the person who bought the stuff seems
> repulsive to me. How is it their fault ? Why would you inflict legal
> BS upon them and ruin their enjoyment of the things they just bought?
> Unbelievable.
> Maybe I'm too naive, and this is how everything works nowadays in this
> world, but not for me. The few people I have dealt with on this list were
> truthful, honest and acted like my friends, not fiduciary barracudas.
> Their good will translates into good feelings from using the stuff.
> Maybe the world doesn't end with bangs, whimpers or men shooting each
> other in the streets, but with ill-will, anger, and threats in a court of
> law. This has been a very sad thing to see here. Maybe I should watch
> Judge Judy more often...It's only camera stuff, Jan. Be happy.
>
> *= Doris Fang =*
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|