> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alain Duquet [SMTP:alain.duquet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 1998 2:29 PM
> To: Mark Dickinson
> Subject: Re: [OM] 200mm f5 vs. 100mm f2.8 & 2XA
>
> My mother-in-law have a 200mm f5 to sell. If you are interested, I can
> propose
> a deal with her.
> I'm not sure about the price, I will evaluate the condition of the lens
> for you.
>
> Regards
>
> Alain
>
> Mark Dickinson a écrit:
>
> > I have a 100 f2.8 and a 135 f3.5. I'm thinking about expanding my focal
> > length options up to about 200. However, I am very keen to keep my OM
> outfit
> > as small and light (and inexpensive!) as possible as this is one of the
> main
> > attractions of the whole system. I'm considering a 200 f5 OR a 2XA,
> which
> > would give me the equivalent of a 200 f5.6 AND a f270 f7 (VERY slow but
> of
> > some use?). I've never seen the 200 f5 but have been interested in the
> > recent discussion on the list. So, how do the 200 f5 and 2XA compare in:
> > - size and weight
> > - price (used) (UK prices of particular interest)
> > - availability (used)
> > - image quality (2XA with 100 f2.8)?
> > In the interim I am considering a cheaper 2x teleconverter as a short
> term
> > solution. Which (cheaper) non-Zuiko converters are best?
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|