Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Zuiko 35-70/f3.6 (was "200mm f5 vs. 100mm f2.8 & 2XA")

Subject: Re: [OM] Zuiko 35-70/f3.6 (was "200mm f5 vs. 100mm f2.8 & 2XA")
From: Joel Wilcox <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 16:39:50 -0600
At 03:49 PM 10/31/1998 -0500, John you wrote:
>
>To be sure, I have never used the 35-70/3.5-4.5 that many seem to be
>enamored with.  However, the only reason that I could tell the
>difference between pics taken with the 35-70/3.6 and the 90/2 macro is
>the fact that I took the pictures myself.  I sold the 3.6 only because
>its lack of true speed compromised its utility in situations where I
>would have liked it to shine (e.g., indoor portraiture, stage/theater
>photography, etc.).  I have replaced it with the Vivitar Series I
>35-85/2.8 VariFocal, supposedly until I can afford a Zuiko 35-80/2.8. 
>
Hi John,

How do you like the Viv 35-85 in comparison to the Zuiko 35-70/3.6?

Joel

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz