At 02:09 PM 10/31/1998 -0600, Greg you wrote:
>Well the lack of TTL flash on the OM-1 and the mercury battery requirement
>might make the OM-1n worth the extra $80. Also some of the OM-1s don't take
>motor drives (mine doesn't), dont know if you checked for that. Personally
>I've always liked the 2's better anyway (probably because I started on an
>OM-2), anyway that's just me :).
>
>Greg
>
Hi Greg:
There's no TTL capability with flash on either the OM-1 or OM-1n. The OM-1n
and OM-2n share the Shoe 4, but on the OM-1n this gives only a ready light
in the viewfinder.
Joel
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|