On Sat, 31 Oct 1998 14:09:30 -0600, Greg wrote:
>Well the lack of TTL flash on the OM-1 and the mercury battery requirement
>might make the OM-1n worth the extra $80. Also some of the OM-1s don't take
>motor drives (mine doesn't), dont know if you checked for that. Personally
>I've always liked the 2's better anyway (probably because I started on an
>OM-2), anyway that's just me :).
It's not really TTL flash anyway; all you get extar with the OM1-n is
a duplicated "ready light" in the finder. In every other respect the
flash operation is the same.
I have both; the 22 year old OM1 feels much silkier and sweeter that
its younger brother. Just nicely run in, I suppose! I still trust them
more than the 3 OM2-n's and OM2SP we also have "in the family".
Regards
--
John Gruffydd (Mold, Wales, UK)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|