If I recall correctly, John Hermanson has mentioned previously that the 1-4
OMs have mechanical finesse such as roller bearings on some shafts instead
of bushes and sleeves. In particular there are mechanisms employed to
reduce mirror slap and associated vibrations. I would guess that these
measures may also account for why the shutter/mirror sound of these cameras
is often considered quiet - which stands to reason as noise is the product
of mechanical vibration.
I am not saying that none of the other OMs do not employ some of these
features, just that I am unaware of it and do recall in particular John
making mention of the single digits having them.
Giles
> I'm considering an Olympus SLR. I've read all the Oly faqs I can get my
> hands on, but I'm still left wondering a few things. I've picked up on the
> idea that OM-1,2,3,4 cameras seem to be more robust/solid than the
> OMF-F/G/etc. but I can't seem to find out why. Isn't the OM-G (or is it F)
> the camera with the semi-autofocus (focus indicator)? Does this system
> work very well? Or do you think I should try an OM-1 or 2 (3's and 4's
> are out of my price range)?
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|