PITA - I like that one <g> - gotta remember it.
I ran into the same thing with my insurance man. The coverage limit is well
below the value of many of the pieces of equipment. The on-going hassle of
keeping all the documentation current, however, is something I've just
learned to live with. Since Ken's story of the theft of his stuff a while
back, I created and maintain a list of all my photo gear, complete with
serial numbers. To William's point, the rider is very low cost. I have all
my photo and telescope toys, er equipment, all on the one rider, classified
as optical equipment and accessories. Heaven forbid I should ever need it,
but its there........
John P
______________________________________
there is no "never" - just long periods of "not yet".
there is no "always" - just long periods of "so far"
Denton Taylor <denton@xxxxxxxx> embellished:
>
>Gotta watch this, tho. Most of the time, items like cameras are covered up
>to a certain amount. You will need a supplemantal rider to your coverage to
>cover you if you have a lot of stuff. And they tend to be a PITA because
>you have to submit a list of equipmet, with serial numbers, so if you tend
>to trade equipment a lot, the list gets obsolete fast.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|