Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OT "entitled" to an opinion?; multi-spot

Subject: Re: [OM] OT "entitled" to an opinion?; multi-spot
From: "Terry and Tracey" <foxcroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 15:30:45 +1100
Defineitely off topic. Please delete if you wish.

John,
This law applies to the US of A, not the internet (much as I agree with it).
Not many other countries have this right established in a constitution. We
don't.

Foxy (from the land of convicts)

-----Original Message-----


>Since about December 15, 1791.  A little piece of paper commonly refered to
>as "The Bill of Rights".  To refresh your memory:
>
>Amendment I.
>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
>prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,
>or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
>petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
>
>You may not agree, and that too is your right.  But whether you agree or
not
>is utterly irrelevant; the person has the right.
>
>John P
>______________________________________
>there is no "never" - just long periods of "not yet".
>there is no "always" - just long periods of "so far"
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [OM] OT "entitled" to an opinion?; multi-spot, Terry and Tracey <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz