Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] "entitled" to an opinion?; multi-spot

Subject: RE: [OM] "entitled" to an opinion?; multi-spot
From: Wayne Harridge <Wayne.Harridge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 16:19:28 +1100

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Petrush [SMTP:petrush@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, January 10, 1999 1:35 PM
> To:   olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:      Re: [OM] "entitled" to an opinion?; multi-spot
> 
> Since about December 15, 1791.  A little piece of paper commonly refered
> to
> as "The Bill of Rights".  To refresh your memory:
> 
> Amendment I.
> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
> prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,
> or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
> petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
> 
> You may not agree, and that too is your right.  But whether you agree or
> not
> is utterly irrelevant; the person has the right.
> 
        Not that I disagree in principle, but surely this only applies to
the U.S.A., not an international forum such as we have here.  I must check
the Australian constitution to see if Frank really was entitled to make
those statements while on Australian soil !

        ...Wayne


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz