In a message dated 1/17/99 1:03:39 AM Eastern Standard Time,
sfsttj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
<< But if speed really matters, why own OM anyway ? A 24/2.0 ? Yaaaawn,
Canon has a jewel of a 24/1.4. A 28/2.0 ? Passe'....Nikon has its 28/1.4.
35/2.0 ? Puhleeze...85/2.0 ? How quaint. But I do not mean to rock the
boat, only to say that one should consider the use the lenses one owns
will be put to. Take Giles' and William S's advice, but remember, thanks
to the wisdom of Mr. Maitani, there are options within the OM system. To
each her/his own.
*= Doris Fang =*
>>
Doris,
You shouldn't worry about rocking the boat because what you said was 100%
right on. Many of us would agree if we took the time to figure out why we
really use the OM system to this day.
George S.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|