Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Lens Test: 100-200mm S Zuiko

Subject: [OM] Lens Test: 100-200mm S Zuiko
From: PCACala@xxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:00:22 EST
I tested the 100-200mm f/5 S Zuiko with and without the Olympus 2X
teleconverter.  As a result, there are a lot of grades here.  This lens is a
real stovepipe that gets worse (excessively long) with the 2X attached.  For
being in an overall compact lens lineup, this is very non-Zuiko'ish.  For
definitive testing (read: use) it requires a lens clamping arm on a tripod.
It is too bad that it wasn't designed to accept the tripod mount collar, which
it needs.
***
100-200mm f/5 S Zuiko (multi-coated)
@100mm setting
Vignetting = B
Distortion = None
Aperture  Center    Corner
5         C+        B-
8         B+        B
11        A-        B
16        B+        B
22        B-        B-
32        B-        C+
Notes: low contrast.

@150mm setting
Vignetting = None
Distortion = pincushion
Aperture  Center    Corner
5         B-        B-
8         B         B-
11        B         B-
16        B+        B-
22        B         C+
32        C+        C-
Notes: moderately low contrast.

@200mm setting
Vignetting = B
Distortion = slight pincushion
Aperture  Center    Corner
5         D         D+
8         D+        C-
11        B-        C+
16        C*        C+
22        B         B-
32        B-        C
Notes: * = possible effects of internal camera body vibration at 1/2 sec.
shutter speed.

100-200mm f/5 S Zuiko (multi-coated) with Olympus 2X Converter
@100mm setting (effective 200mm)[not tested - illogical setting]

@150mm setting (effective 300mm)
Vignetting = A-
Distortion = slight waveform
Aperture  Center    Corner
5 (10)    F+        F+
8 (16)    D         D
11 (22)   D+        D+
16 (32)   C         C
22 (44)   C         C
32 (64)   D+        D+

@200mm setting (effective 400mm)
Vignetting = A-
Distortion = slight pincushion
Aperture  Center    Corner
5 (10)    C+        C+
8 (16)    B-        C+
11 (22)   B         C+
16 (32)   B-        C+
22 (44)   C         D
32 (64)   D-        D-
Notes: very unstable and ungainly combination. Nearly impossible to focus even
with a Varimagnifinder and a 1-8 screen.  I used a second tripod to support
the front of the lens, which probably accounts for superior SQF values over
the 200mm setting without 2X Converter.  The 1/8th to 4 sec. exposures may
have caused harmonic vibrations within the OM-1 body, despite mirror lockup, a
heavy tripod  and use of a cable release.

Gary Reese
Las Vegas, NV

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [OM] Lens Test: 100-200mm S Zuiko, PCACala <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz