Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Olympus class action

Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus class action
From: bhinderks@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 10:26:55 -0800
At 11:11 AM 1/31/99 -0800, you wrote:
>To be clear, I said "A business requires profit to survive."  I did **not**
>say "businesses exist ONLY for the purpose of making money, and for NO OTHER
>reason.", *you* did.  There is a substantial difference.  Don't see the
>difference?  Go to your corner video store and rent a Betamax tape.  Sony

Hear, hear couldn't agree more. My 24 year old OM-1MD has served me well.
Never a moments hesitation, never serviced and always works. Why should I
expect or demand parts etc etc on something I knew had a finite life from a
manufacturing standpoint? Take a look at the computer industry - should I
expect, nay demand, parts for my Commodore 64?

Barry


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz