>From: Matthias Wilke <Matthias.K.Wilke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>Jan wrote:
>
>>No, it would be terrible. This lens is for one specific purpose only, and
>>furthermore, you have to be a licensed architect to legally use it. Other
>>things it is useless for: trees, waterfalls, tiny, long things (with
>>extension tubes). In short, it will be totally useless for any long object
>>EXCEPT a boring building.
>
>This isn't true, a shift lens is also interesting for trees respectively
>the forest...
Ssshhh, Matthias! I think I almost had Warren talked out of it! :-)
(For the humor impaired, please accept my apology for not putting a smiley
face after each paragraph in that posting. I guess one at the end wasn't
enough. <g> :-) <grin> (-: <wink>
: Jan Steinman <mailto:jans@xxxxxxxxxxx>
: 19280 Rydman Court, West Linn, OR 97068-1331 USA
: +1.503.635.3229
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|