>>Jan wrote:
>>
>>>No, it would be terrible. This lens is for one specific purpose only, and
>>>furthermore, you have to be a licensed architect to legally use it. Other
>>>things it is useless for: trees, waterfalls, tiny, long things (with
>>>extension tubes). In short, it will be totally useless for any long object
>>>EXCEPT a boring building.
>>
>>This isn't true, a shift lens is also interesting for trees respectively
>>the forest...
>
>Ssshhh, Matthias! I think I almost had Warren talked out of it! :-)
>
>(For the humor impaired, please accept my apology for not putting a smiley
>face after each paragraph in that posting. I guess one at the end wasn't
>enough. <g> :-) <grin> (-: <wink>
Sorry, I must have read your message "diagonal" (fleeting or flying).
Matthias
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|