| Subject: | Re: [OM] The 35mm vs. MF myth - was: resolution vs format size-35 vs 67 |
|---|---|
| From: | Denton Taylor <denton@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Feb 1999 22:07:51 -0500 |
>>I was shocked, after investing so much
money, the only thing I got was a "small picture camera" ? >>
I believe even the great Leica was called a 'miniature camera' for many
years...
Regards,
Denton Taylor
_______________________________
Photogallery at www.dentontaylor.com
Panoramic and 360deg Immersive Images at
www.threehundredsixty.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Nikon (and other) digital SLRs, Denton Taylor |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] eyecup / glasses recommendation, R. Wastell |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] The 35mm vs. MF myth - was: resolution vs format size-35 vs 67, Matthias Wilke |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] The 35mm vs. MF myth - was: resolution vs format size-35 vs 67, Matthias Wilke |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |