On Mon, 22 Feb 1999 17:43:27 EST, ClassicVW@xxxxxxx wrote:
>Hi Frank,
> It was pointed out to me that my reply to you the other day was a bit
> harsh.
>I would like to apologize to you for that, and thank you for offering to
>possibly mediate that woman's dispute.
> And to all on the list, I'll shut up about it from now on. Thanks for
>everyone's patience.
> And thanks to Simon for steering me back on the straight and narrow!
>
>George S.
Thanks for your message, George.
Apologies accepted, and discussion closed, AFAIAC.
Please read the conversation I had with the 'scammed woman' below.
>On Mon, 22 Feb 1999 19:21:10 -0800, <Higgens@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Greetings,
>>I was told to e-mail you re: jac from holland and not being honest. I
>>did recieve an e-mail from him today informing me that he was in fact
>>returning my money. So at this point everything should be o.k. Thank you
>>for your concern.
>>Pattie
>>Higgens@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>All right, Pattie.
>
>I basically know the man as honest (but I do not know him that well,
>only from similar business as yours) and therefore I had the
>impression that your problem must be a misunderstanding. I would have
>been happy to help it getting solved, but now that my concern isn't
>needed anymore - even better!
>
>Best wishes from Holland.
>
>Frank.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|