On Sat, 20 Mar 1999 15:51:16 +0100, "Marco Tomat" <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>With an A-28 on a 24 2.8 results are not so promising in the viewfinder...
>bad borders and ugly corners.
>
>Marco
I agree, Marco. I have only found the B-28 to be very useful on a 35mm
(which it was made for). It can also be used on a 28, but this is
about the limit for acceptable results. 24 is out.
The B-300, made for 135mm, is really best on this focal length but it
can also be used with good results on a 200/4. The versatility of the
tele-converter is better than of the wide-angle, IMHO.
Frank van Lindert
Utrecht NL.
>
>----------
>>Da: "marc simon" <marc.simon@xxxxxxx>
>>A: "Olympus mailing list" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Oggetto: [OM] Re: IS-3 300mm converter
>>Data: Mer, 17 mar 1999 23:05
>>
>
>> What I've done following the example of Frank is to use the B-28 (x.8)
>> converter with a wide angle, in my case the 24 f/2.8 and here again the
>> results are rather interesting. In both case I use a step down ring.
>> regards
>> marc
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|