Glenn,
You've just set yourself up for the infamous camera body failure on
the trip of a lifetime<g>. Take two bodies. Afterall, the beauty of the
OM is its compactness. --Greg
Date sent: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 01:02:19 -0800
From: owner-olympus-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (olympus-digest)
To: olympus-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: olympus-digest V2 #838
Send reply to: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> At 10:05 PM 24/03/99 -0800, Glen Lowry wrote:
> >
> >[snip]
> >
> >>I love wide angles and was looking at picking up a 24/2, 28/2, or 35/2--
> and
> >>possibly a 21. And I was hoping, I might get some advice from those of
> you
> >>using these lenses. Are there any of these fast wides (SC/MC) that I
> should
> >>steer clear of? I've seen Gary Reese's test page--a real treat--but
> noticed
> >>that there was no listing for the 28/2; so what's the skinny on this lens.
> >
> >I've got nothing objective to say about this lens, but I own it (the MC
> version), and subjectively, couldn't be more pleased. My wife and I are
> going to France in the near future, and she's insisted that I *not* bring
> along every lens in the stable, so the 28/2.0 and the 100/2.0 are getting
> the nod, along with one body (either the 2S or the 4).
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|