>b. 200f2.8
I have an older Soligor 200/2.8 that seems a bit slower than 2.8, doesn't
quite focus to infinity and is a bit less contrasty than any Zuiko lens
I've used. That said, I think it is a bit sharper than the Zuiko 200/5 I
had and has less distortion.
My previous experience with the 135/2.8 was at the camera shop I worked at
and I really checked out the new ones we had in stock. I don't remember
the specifics now, but there was no comparison to the Zuiko 100/2.8 I had.
I spent $150 on my 200/2.8 which for the quality of the lens I feel is
reasonable. It has earned its keep and as long as my expectations aren't
too high, I'm satisfied.
ken
Kenneth E. Norton
Image66 Photography
image66@xxxxxxx
(515) 791-2306
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|