Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #886

Subject: [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #886
From: "Tom Trottier" <infoanim@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 10:30:19 -0400
Too bad the mirror prefire did not also do an aperture prefire. Something for 
the OM-5 and OM-6.
It seems to me some vibration mode was excited. Perhaps adding some extra 
weight to the lens would interfere with this. Perhaps some lead sinkers 
attached with Velcro? Or even better, a bean bag with BBs that would 
absorg/diffuse vibration. It's easier to add than subtract.
Tom

> Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 21:06:21 +0200
> From: Richard Schaetzl <Richard.Schaetzl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [OM] 200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4
> 
...
> To verifiy this I prefired the aperture of an OM-1 with flipped up mirror
> (taped the DOF button down). This had an very noticeable effect of reduced
> vibrations (practicaly as good as an OM-4 with selftimer). Prefireing of
> the aperture alone had an much bigger effect on reducing the vibration
> than a simple mirror prefire. 
...
------------------
From: Tom Trottier, President, ACT Productions Inc.
infoanim@xxxxxx                   http://www.act.ca
+1 613 594-4829                 fax +1 613 594-8944
199 Holmwood Ave,  Ottawa, Ontario, Canada  K1S 2P3
"Make it as simple as possible, but no simpler" - Einstein

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #886, Tom Trottier <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz