I was in Ye Olde Overpriced National Chain Kamera Emporium this weekend,
and encountered an OM-PC in the used bin, priced at $150. It was a
"9"--some cosmetic wear, but seemed to be fine functionally. It had a
50/1.8 SC mounted (sold separately). Having never met the "PC" socially, I
asked to see it. The salesman pooh-poohed it as "nothing special."
I discovered that I really liked it. I'm an OM-2 owner, and a glasses
wearer. The viewfinder image of the PC is a little smaller than my OM-2,
but I could see amost the entire frame, and it appeared to be significantly
brighter. I also found that the image seemed easier to focus. I almost
didn't need the microprism. As someone who really prefers rangefinder
focusing, I felt really comfortable focusing the PC. I didn't buy it, but
I was tempted.
I also liked the way the OM-PC fit in my hands, the lightness, and the
shutter speed visiblity in the viewfinder. It seemed a bit noisier, and
seemed a bit flimsier than my OM-2. It doesn't have spot metering like the
OM2-s, 4T{i}, or even the OM-2000. But perhaps the "ESP" metering
mitigates this somewhat--or does it? I've also read about some difficulty
with repairs/obtaining parts/circuit boards (John Hermanson, your
perspective)?
Now, I know the OM-PC has some plastic in the body, is considered a
"consumer" rather than "Pro" camera, does not take interchangeable focusing
screens, and won't do automatic long exposures greater than 2 seconds.
But since I have an OM-2 already, it seems to me that the OM-PC would make
a great second body. And for fast, dim-light shooting, it might have some
advantages.
Request for opinions on the OM-PC!
--- Peter
/\: ________ __ ========= , , , , , , |' , ,
/ b | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ~|' |
/ b b ,| ,| ,| ,| ,| ,| ' ,| | ,| |__|__|__| |__| | | | |
~' =========
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|