Charles;
:>) Or, maybe should be shut-shud for clarity. :>)
George
Charles Loeven wrote:
>
> >I've always figured shu-shu would be insignificant. Certainly this is
> true with 4300 grams worth of lens, as in this case! :>)
>
> George,
> The only thing I will add is, thanks for the new word.
> Shu-Shu. :-)
>
> Charlie L.
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|